Mr. Speaker, it was reported in today's papers that the member for Dauphin—Swan River is taking advice from the Americans on what position to take on Bill C-55, an act respecting advertising services by foreign periodical publishers.
The member for Dauphin—Swan River can argue as much as he wants that he got information from both sides, but facts are facts. The member met with American representatives then took his decision by himself before he announced it to the House. Two weeks after the fact did he agree to meet with the representatives from the Canadian magazine industry when they requested a meeting to set the facts straight?
The member for Dauphin—Swan River can argue as much as he wants that he got information from both sides. Just because his seat mate chooses to ignore him does not mean that the member should not communicate with Canadians. It is obvious or it may as well be written ink that the member is off the mark.