Mr. Speaker, we have no problem with Motion No. 3. We see however a discrepancy with the term “material harm” that could cause more harm than what we used to have.
What I have tried to do is go over the notes of the committee to find more arguments to use in the House. Unfortunately, I did not find any. Is it only a language issue? I hope not, but it seems like it.
We will vote against Motion No. 4, therefore against Motion No. 7 also.