Mr. Speaker, I see a lack of logic in the position of the members opposite.
While they say the questions in the last two referendums were not clear, they use the responses to these questions to argue that Quebeckers chose to remain in Canada. Either the question was unclear or it was not.
If it was, so was the answer, and so the 50% less three-tenths cannot be used. If it was not, then they should stop saying it was.