Mr. Speaker, the hon. member only had the time to talk about alfalfa; however, I would have liked him—but I am not surprised as you must maintain control over our proceedings—to ask me about strike-breakers.
I must say that I am much more interested in his opinion on the anti-stribreaking provision than his comment on alfalfa and growing alfalfa with other types of grain, or who should be in charge of applying the labour code. I will just respond briefly to the first part of his remarks.
Last week, three bills were introduced, showing polarization between regions of Canada. It is true that there are many provisions that cause a polarization between regions of Canada, and that is why we in Quebec consider at any rate that your country is not necessarily our country. That is why we say the current system does not work.
Because of the distinct nature of Quebec, we feel there should be new talks leading to a new partnership between the two sovereign states of Canada and Quebec. This polarization is becoming increasing clear, and the current Liberal government tends to prove it.
We are looking forward to the next referendum, when, three days before referendum day, the rest of Canada will come and tell us how much they care. I cannot wait to see that. After all the instances of polarization since 1995, they come and tell us “We love you, Quebec”. You mean “We love you, Quebec, when you are on your knees”.