That the amendment be amended by deleting all the words after the words “Minister of Finance” and substituting the following:
“because he has, by creating the Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation, broken the promise to respect provincial jurisdiction over education, he has provided nothing to stimulate job creation, he has not provided for adequate income tax reductions for middle-class families, he has continued to appropriate the huge employment insurance fund surplus, he has obstinately refused to table anti-deficit legislation and he has not returned to the provinces the money he cut from their transfer payments, while pursuing his planned cuts up to the year 2003”.
The question is on the amendment to the amendment. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment to the amendment?