Mr. Speaker, on the second point of consultation, the regime described in the bill is simply a carryover of the existing practice. The minister is accountable in this House for those decisions. The minister is a politician like the rest of us. It is normal to expect the minister in order to avoid a political firestorm to consult widely to protect the government in the fashion which has been the practice up to the current moment. It is a practice which is simply being reincarnated in the proposed legislation.
As for the point about the renaming aspect of the bill, I would venture a personal opinion here. When we have a brand name like Parks Canada we would be a little careful about frittering away the benefits of that brand name. It may be that the agency aspect may simply be the title of record. Those are decisions we will have to make in due course.