Mr. Speaker, I take a different view of the facts. My provincial colleagues, my counterparts, take a different view of the facts. I have explained the principle upon which we proceeded. The member is entitled to disagree.
This is the basis upon which all governments have approached this matter. If we are to compensate people who are harmed however tragically through no fault, with people acting in good faith based on the evidence that is in hand in the medical system, then that is a very dangerous course on which to proceed.
We have identified the principle upon which we have acted. All governments are agreed that this is the appropriate approach.