I have looked at the amendment to the motion. I refer hon. members to Beauchesne's sixth edition, citation 568, which states:
It is an imperative rule that every amendment must be relevant to the question on which the amendment is proposed. Every amendment proposed to be made, either to a question or to a proposed amendment, should be so framed that, if agreed to by the House, the question or amendment as amended would be intelligible and consistent with itself.
On that basis I find the amendment out of order.