Mr. Speaker, what we have here is more an issue of debate, rather than one which is otherwise. Hon. members opposite, both in oral and in written questions, have differences in what they believe to be accurate or otherwise.
The information I have as Leader of the Government in the House of Commons is that the information provided by my hon. colleague, the minister of fisheries, is in fact accurate. If the member feels that he has new information that indicates otherwise and if he wants to write to us to seek further clarification, there is certainly nothing that stops him from doing so.
Clearly, there is no intention either on the part of the hon. minister of fisheries, myself or anyone else in the government to provide information that is anything other than correct. We still believe that the information that was tabled in the House of Commons is correct.
Finally, the facts which we brought were gathered after considerable research. That does not mean that anyone is beyond making a mistake, but the information that we have now is that the information is accurate.
I do not believe that it is necessary for the member across to whom we listened very patiently, notwithstanding his heckling, to continue to make accusations against others.
If the issue was one of making accusations with regard to one's adherence to the Fisheries Act, I could heckle a few from my vantage point across to him.