Mr. Speaker, let me give the Prime Minister examples.
It is unclear what the supreme court means by a modest living or whether non-status natives will enjoy this preferential right to fish that is allowed by the Marshall decision.
Flawed as it is, this decision needs clarification to establish the place of non-aboriginal fishermen in this fishery, fishermen whose families have been fishing these waters for 200 and 300 years.
Why is the government refusing to return court for clarification of this irresponsible and unrealistic decision?