Mr. Speaker, if this is not relevant then we are in the wrong place. This is more than relevant. The hon. member does not seem to understand that I have said time and time again in this particular speech that we agree with Bill C-4.
What we do not agree with is just exactly what is going on with the so-called democracy in this place. It is okay if I stand here and agree with Bill C-4. It is okay if I agree with the space station. It is okay as long as we agree with the Liberal Party. If any member on this side disagrees with the Liberal Party, we get time allocation and closure. That is what is wrong and that is what is relevant with this bill.
It is about time bills like this, that we agree on, that we talk a long time on and everything else that comes into the House. If the member thinks that is not relevant, he should just try us. It is more than relevant.
The government has a really bad habit as a majority government. We can count, as I already have, the number of bills it has called closure on after a number of hours. It is coming up, in almost half the time, to surpassing Mr. Mulroney in the number of times he called closure or time allocation. However, that is okay with the Liberals.
Here is a sweet space station everybody agrees with, so the guys can talk here for a week if they want. However, when we disagree or if my colleague's party, the NDP, disagree with a bill, just watch how long it takes the Liberals to call time allocation or closure. It is okay if a member wants to stand up for the space station because everyone agrees with it.