Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs justifies his bill on Quebec's next referendum by saying that the federal government needs to define under what conditions the question would be clear.
How can the minister presume to define under what conditions the question asked at the next referendum would be clear and unbiased when his bill refers 23 times to the concept of secession and is clearly worded to give a negative connotation to a legitimate project to which almost half of Quebecers subscribe?