Mr. Speaker, my response is that there is no contradiction at all. The reason the supreme court talks about a clear majority is obviously because the clarity of the majority must be assessed, and for that it is necessary to know the circumstances in which a referendum is held. There is therefore no pre-set threshold either, any more than there is such a threshold in Quebec's Loi des consultations populaires.
If the member is determined that one vote should have the same value as another, she should tell us that it is three out of five and that it will take three victories in a row to wipe out our two—