Mr. Speaker, even in the Projected Order of Business, Standing Order 43 is specified.
If what is meant to guide us in the process of debate is obsolete, and tradition allows us to do the opposite of what it says, things are all wrong.
From what I have seen in the past, Standing Order 43 has applied when the speakers involved were the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, the minister making the motion or the member speaking in reply to the government. They had an unlimited amount of time but not an ordinary member of the House. It is all very well that the member in question is the chair of the Standing Committee on Finance but that is not covered by the standing orders.
As far as I can recall, this standing order has always been applied in relation to the work of the finance committee.