Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 22, which was negatived on the following division:)
House of Commons Hansard #234 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was environment.
Division No. 461Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 22, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 518Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motions Nos. 22, 23, 24, 36, 37 and 151 defeated. Consequently I declare Motions Nos. 41, 70 and 73 defeated.
The next question is on Motion No. 62. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 63 and 68. An affirmative vote on Motion No. 62 obviates the necessity of putting the question on Motions Nos. 64 to 67. A negative vote on Motion No. 62 necessitates the question being put on Motions Nos. 64 to 67.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, you will find unanimous consent that those members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion currently before the House, with the Liberal members voting no.
Division No. 518Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, the government is wrong on this one. The Reform Party members present are voting yes.
Madeleine Dalphond-Guiral Bloc Laval Centre, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote yes.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, members of the New Democratic Party present this evening vote no to the motion.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will vote yes to the motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 62, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 462Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 62 defeated. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 63 and 68 defeated.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to Motion No. 115.
Division No. 462Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Division No. 462Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 115, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 477Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 115 defeated.
The next question is on Motion No. 64.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, you will find unanimous consent that those members who voted on the preceding motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with the Liberal members voting yes.
Division No. 477Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote yes to the motion.
Madeleine Dalphond-Guiral Bloc Laval Centre, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote yes.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, the New Democratic Party members present this evening in the spirit of co-operation vote yes to the motion.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will vote for the motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 64, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Division No. 463Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 64 agreed to.
The question is on Motion No. 65. If Motion No. 65 is defeated, Motions Nos. 66 and 67 will have to be voted on.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 463Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?