The Veterans Review and Appeal Board adjudicated over 49,000 cases in the past five years and does not track the nature of the evidence presented in support of claims. As such, the board cannot state with certainty that the information described by the hon. member has not been before the board. However, to the best of our knowledge and recollection the only case where mefloquine was presented is the case referenced in the following paragraph (g).
(a) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(b) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(c) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(d) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(e) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(f) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board;
(g) Yes, Eric Marinacci, pensions advocate, Bureau of Pensions Advocates, provided the information described by the hon. member in paragraph (g) when presenting a particular case to a former board, the Canadian Pension Commission, on December 6, 1994. That case subsequently proceeded to appeal and the Veterans Review and Appeal Board received the information between September 15, 1995 and December 21, 1995 when it obtained the file from the Department of Veterans Affairs in order to prepare for the appeal;
(h) Yes, the Veterans Review and Appeal Board received the information on April 30, 1999 from the Auditor General of Canada in his report to the House of Commons dated April 1999; and
(i) No, to the best of our knowledge, unless it was given by an appellant in the course of a specific appeal before the board.