Give me a moment to finish. Our question should have been worded as follows: “The question is either for the Minister of Human Resources Development, who is currently responsible, or for the Minister for International Trade, who is largely responsible for this mess”. The government would then have had the option of allowing the former minister to answer or of preventing him from doing so, as was the case today.
Did I understand correctly the conclusions you drew on this issue and your teachings to the House today?