Mr. Speaker, first of all, it was a period of time of high unemployment. Then the minister said it was not a period of time at all, it was actually a geographic location. Now we find out it may be that or it may be something else or it may be whatever they woke up and decided it would be.
It seems that the approval process is not local at all. It appears to be tied together quite closely to the front bench.
Why does the minister say that picking a pocket of high unemployment deserves to be done in her office?