House of Commons Hansard #55 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was mail.

Topics

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Pierre De Savoye Bloc Portneuf, QC

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-20 is presently the subject of an extremely important debate, especially since this legislation is about to deny Quebecers their most basic rights.

I have here an article by the Canadian Press, published on February 21 and entitled “Ottawa Wants to Neutralize Quebec on the International Scene”. I think this document would be of great interest to the House and I seek unanimous consent to table it.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Yvan Loubier Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC

Mr. Speaker, following statements and list changes made by the Minister of Human Resources Development, I would like to table, for her benefit and that of her colleagues, a book entitled “The New Adventures of Pinocchio”. I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table this book.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Monique Guay Bloc Laurentides, QC

Mr. Speaker, following the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill denying the fundamental rights of Quebecers, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document that will greatly enlighten it.

This is an article from the newspaper Le Devoir of February 7, 2000, entitled “Bill C-20 on Clarity: Dion Accused of Lacking Limpidity”.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent of the House?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Pauline Picard Bloc Drummond, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to table in the House an article from the newspaper Le Devoir of February 19, 2000, entitled “Partisan Politics and Federal Grants”.

According to this article, the Prime Minister made a statement at a fundraising cocktail, saying “It is quite normal that we, the Liberals who form the government, come out and say that the Liberal Party is the one in government and doing things. To those who contend there is something wrong with that, I say it is routinely done. I cannot see why, if we want to get credit for what we are doing, we should be embarrassed to do so”.

The Prime Minister was reported as saying that he thought it was normal and in keeping with Canadian political standards that elected Liberals would take credit, for partisan politics purposes, for billions of dollars in grants provided by the Department of Human Resources Development.

I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document that will enlighten the members of this House.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent of the House?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Benoît Sauvageau Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Speaker, further to the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill denying Quebecers their fundamental rights, I ask for unanimous consent—confident that I will get it—to table a document which would enlighten this House.

It is an article published in the daily paper Le Soleil on February 21, 2000, and entitled “Time's Up”. Speaking of time being up, Mr. Speaker, you will let me explain what that document is about, will you not?

I will read an excerpt:

Should there be a third referendum on sovereignty? Amid stormy weather, when numerous voices try to dissuade Lucien Bouchard from risking a third one, the Mouvement national des Québécois launched yesterday a campaign to promote a referendum.

In the coming months, the public will see popping up everywhere the picture of a parking meter topped with the following slogan: “Yes, time is up!” There will also be a touring theatre play for Cegep students and seven mobilization meetings for women.

“We are in an era of extreme federalism, said Yves Michaud”. “We think that Ottawa does not intend to give anything to Quebec”, added the president of the MNQ, Louise Paquet. Besides explaining why we promoted independence 20 years ago—

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent of the House to table this document?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

Bloc

Antoine Dubé Bloc Lévis, QC

Mr. Speaker, further to the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill that denies the fundamental rights of Quebecers, I am asking for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document that will enlighten it.

It is an article published in the February 9 issue of Le Soleil entitled “Clarity Bill”.

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

Is there unanimous consent?

Point Of OrderOral Question Period

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.