Mr. Speaker, if it is just a trip across the river, I imagine the committee could manage it too.
What was good for British Columbia, because British Columbians were consulted, even though the government in Victoria was in agreement with the bill, should also be for Quebec. Why, when there was consultation for the Nisga'a treaty, is the government refusing to do the same in the case of Bill C-20? Is what is good for British Columbia not good for Quebec?
Could he explain how he arrived at this strange decision, without resorting to geographic technicalities and nonsense?