House of Commons Hansard #63 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was yea.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jean-Guy Chrétien Bloc Frontenac—Mégantic, QC
moved:
Motion No. 377
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Dumas Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau, QC
moved:
Motion No. 378
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Paul Mercier Bloc Terrebonne—Blainville, QC
moved:
Motion No. 379
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Christiane Gagnon Bloc Québec, QC
moved:
Motion No. 380
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Antoine Dubé Bloc Lévis, QC
moved:
Motion No. 381
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Benoît Sauvageau Bloc Repentigny, QC
moved:
Motion No. 382
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, QC
moved:
Motion No. 383
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yves Rocheleau Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC
moved:
Motion No. 384
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2010.”
Motion No. 385
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Fournier Bloc Manicouagan, QC
moved:
Motion No. 386
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pauline Picard Bloc Drummond, QC
moved:
Motion No. 387
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Fournier Bloc Manicouagan, QC
moved:
Motion No. 388
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Michel Guimond Bloc Beauport—Montmorency—Orléans, QC
moved:
Motion No. 389
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Benoît Sauvageau Bloc Repentigny, QC
moved:
Motion No. 390
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Dumas Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau, QC
moved:
Motion No. 391
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jean-Guy Chrétien Bloc Frontenac—Mégantic, QC
moved:
Motion No. 392
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, QC
moved:
Motion No. 393
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Gérard Asselin Bloc Charlevoix, QC
moved:
Motion No. 394
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Antoine Dubé Bloc Lévis, QC
moved:
Motion No. 395
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Paul Mercier Bloc Terrebonne—Blainville, QC
moved:
Motion No. 396
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Christiane Gagnon Bloc Québec, QC
moved:
Motion No. 397
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Serge Cardin Bloc Sherbrooke, QC
moved:
Motion No. 398
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Notwithstanding sections 1, 2 and 3, where the population of Quebec is consulted by a referendum, the winning option is the one that obtains a majority of the votes found to be valid, or fifty percent plus one vote.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Bernard Bigras Bloc Rosemont, QC
moved:
Motion No. 399
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of nine months after the coming into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and shall, within 14 months after the review is undertaken submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Richard Marceau Bloc Charlesbourg, QC
moved:
Motion No. 400
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of six months after the coming into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and shall, within five months after the review is undertaken submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Odina Desrochers Bloc Lotbinière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 401
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of nine months after the coming into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yvan Bernier Bloc Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-De-La-Madeleine—Pabok, QC
moved:
Motion No. 402
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) On the expiration of three months after the coming into force of this Act, the provisions contained herein shall be referred to such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by Parliament for that purpose.
(2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken submit a report to the House of Commons thereon.”