House of Commons Hansard #63 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was yea.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC
moved:
Motion No. 305
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is three years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Monique Guay Bloc Laurentides, QC
moved:
Motion No. 306
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is five years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Odina Desrochers Bloc Lotbinière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 307
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Bernard Bigras Bloc Rosemont, QC
moved:
Motion No. 308
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maud Debien Bloc Laval East, QC
moved:
Motion No. 309
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is one year after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pierrette Venne Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 310
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC
moved:
Motion No. 311
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is two years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Monique Guay Bloc Laurentides, QC
moved:
Motion No. 312
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Daniel Turp Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC
moved:
Motion No. 313
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is four years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Richard Marceau Bloc Charlesbourg, QC
moved:
Motion No. 314
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is three years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Odina Desrochers Bloc Lotbinière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 315
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is five years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Caroline St-Hilaire Bloc Longueuil, QC
moved:
Motion No. 316
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 3 shall come into force on the day that is ten years after the day on which this Act is assented to, and sections 1 and 2 shall come into force on the day that is seven years after the day on which this Act is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Bernard Bigras Bloc Rosemont, QC
moved:
Motion No. 317
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Daniel Turp Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC
moved:
Motion No. 318
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Odina Desrochers Bloc Lotbinière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 319
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Monique Guay Bloc Laurentides, QC
moved:
Motion No. 320
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Caroline St-Hilaire Bloc Longueuil, QC
moved:
Motion No. 321
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Odina Desrochers Bloc Lotbinière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 322
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Daniel Turp Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC
moved:
Motion No. 323
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Bernard Bigras Bloc Rosemont, QC
moved:
Motion No. 324
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Benoît Sauvageau Bloc Repentigny, QC
moved:
Motion No. 325
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Serge Cardin Bloc Sherbrooke, QC
moved:
Motion No. 326
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Richard Marceau Bloc Charlesbourg, QC
moved:
Motion No. 327
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2005.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Monique Guay Bloc Laurentides, QC
moved:
Motion No. 328
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pierrette Venne Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 329
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2006.”