That is what I intend to do, Mr. Speaker. I think the member made a point which is relevant to the debate and relevant as to why the motion which she appears to support should not be supported. The member said that as far as she is concerned it is not about the Chair, it is not about you, Mr. Speaker. It is about how she feels about these other things that have happened.
All I am saying is I understand how the member feels about these other things that have happened and I think there are some problems that need to be sorted out. However I do not think that they can be sorted out by this process. I suppose we could say the Bloc members were creating a procedural opportunity to talk about what they wanted to talk about, but I think it was an unfortunate choice of a procedural instrument.
A non-confidence motion of the Speaker is something that should be saved for things that really do have to do with a lack of partiality on the part of the Speaker or some other serious charge. It is not that what the Bloc is concerned about is not a serious matter, but to try to fit this square peg of a concern about all the things that the member has mentioned in to the round hole of whether or not the Speaker should be censured I think is a mistake.
The motion is not going to carry if I read the House correctly. When that is all over I think we will have debased the currency of motions of censure of the Speaker and we will still have the problem that the member talked about. We will have to find another way to deal with it. Whatever that other way of dealing with it is, is the way we should have sought in the first place.