House of Commons Hansard #82 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was family.
Division No. 1267Government Orders
The Speaker
In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 4, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1268Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 4 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 5.
(The House divided on Motion No. 5, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1269Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 5 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 7. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 to 24, 27, 28, 31 to 33, 35, 37 to 39, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66 to 68, 70, 71, 73 to 76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86 to 90, 94 to 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 104, 105, 107 to 110, 135, 137, 138, 140, 142, 143, 146 to 149, 153 to 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 166 to 169, 171 and 172.
(The House divided on Motion No. 7, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1270Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 7 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 to 24, 27, 28, 31 to 33, 35, 37 to 39, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66 to 68, 70, 71, 73 to 76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86 to 90, 94 to 96, 98, 99, 101, 102, 104, 105, 107 to 110, 135, 137, 138, 140, 142, 143, 146 to 149, 153 to 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 166 to 169, 171 and 172 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 113.
(The House divided on Motion No. 113, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1271Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 113 lost. The next question is on Motion No. 115. The vote on this motion will also apply to Motion No. 116.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Division No. 1271Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Division No. 1271Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
All those opposed will please say nay.
Division No. 1271Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 115, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1272Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 115 lost and I therefore Motion No. 116 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 144.
(The House divided on Motion No. 144, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1273Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 144 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 117. The vote on this motion will also apply to Motions Nos. 118 to 133.
(The House divided on Motion No. 117, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1274Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 117 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 118 to 133 lost.
André Harvey Independent Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Before proceeding to the motion for concurrence at report stage, I want to make sure that when the government whip asked for the results of the vote on Motions Nos. 1 to 3 to be applied, Progressive Conservative members who voted in favour were recorded as having voted against Motion No. 3 and Motion No. 1.
Division No. 1274Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I can confirm that the members of the Progressive Conservative Party voted in favour of Motion No. 1 and want to continue to vote in favour of Motion No. 3.
I believe the decision of the House was to apply the vote on Motion No. 1 to Motion No. 3. The members of the Progressive Conservative Party voted yea for these two motions. Is that right?
André Harvey Independent Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, because it was a free vote, we had not provided our voting reports earlier. Application of the vote was sought but I want to make sure that the members who voted yea were considered to have voted nay on Motion No. 3 and Motion No. 1. In other words, for the two votes it is nay.
Division No. 1274Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
What the hon. member has requested is not quite clear to the Speaker. Some members of his party voted in favour, some opposed Motion No. 1.
The question put by the chief government whip was to apply, I believe, the vote of all members on Motion No. 1 to Motion No. 3. This was unanimously agreed to by the House. Do you want to change that?
André Harvey Independent Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, exactly. Vote No. 1 was applied, but we are also making a correction to the vote on Motion No. 1 by voting no. If it is applied to Motion No. 3, therefore, it is no in both cases.
Division No. 1274Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Unless there is unanimous consent of the House to change the vote, I think the matter is done. Is there unanimous consent?
Division No. 1274Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
There is no consent. The vote is recorded as is and it is done.
Anne McLellan LiberalMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.