House of Commons Hansard #98 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was allocation.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 1315Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Jay Hill Reform Prince George—Peace River, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members will be opposed to this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, needless to say, the members of the Bloc Quebecois support this motion.
Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Mr. Speaker, the members of the NDP present are opposed to this motion.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, members of the Conservative Party will be voting no to this motion.
(The House divided on the Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1297Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 3 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 17 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 9.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe there would be unanimous consent to apply the result of the last vote to Motion No. 9.
Division No. 1297Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 1297Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 9, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1309Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 9 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 22.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 1309Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Jay Hill Reform Prince George—Peace River, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present this evening will be voting in favour of this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois vote no to this motion.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting yes to this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 22, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1298Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 22 lost.
We are now going on to Group No. 2. The question is on Motion No. 4. A vote on this motion will also apply to Motion No. 5.
(The House divided on Motion No. 4, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1299Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 4 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 5 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 6.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 1299Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Jay Hill Reform Prince George—Peace River, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members will be voting yea to this motion.