Mr. Speaker, I have to add another piece of information to this in relation to what my colleague across the way just said. There is a huge time difference.
The regulation I was referring to, and the urgent need that the minister made, was taking place on September 11. I raised that issue several weeks later. The time differential there was very different from what my colleague is now raising.
This is a question of privilege because the minister has ignored this for a very long period of time. She has completely disregarded it.
These are two separate issues completely.
I did not raise it as a question of privilege. I wanted the minister to reply. She did not give an adequate answer, Mr. Speaker, but that is really not what concerns you in this case.
In this case we have, I believe, a prima facie case before the House on privilege, and because of the time differential these two are not comparable.