Mr. Speaker, the hon. member's theory seems to be when in doubt, fall back on the whole question of air marshals.
He talked about cockpit door enforcement. We have the authority already and we have done it. The training of flight crews; we have the authority. The so-called air marshals; we have the authority because we have them on the flights to Washington already. The 100% screening; we have the authority. Secure access to aircraft; we have the authority. The penalties for interfering with screeners; we have the authority. Co-ordinated security; we have the solid links.
Why does the hon. member not read the act as it is and he will understand what is in it and what is not in it?