Mr. Speaker, first, I could quote the entire statement of the secretary of state today, but I will briefly highlight the portion which refers to the point just raised which says:
Yesterday I mistakenly linked the city of Prince George with a specific hate activity. I regret that and I apologize to the people of Prince George.
I am very proud of what communities have accomplished in this country to counter racism and hate and to promote cultural diversity, especially the city of Prince George's city council task force on hate activities.
The statement was withdrawn. Therefore, if it was withdrawn and the letter attached to something that was withdrawn is equally withdrawn.
Second, it was said that the minister had two hours to think it through. I would think most members in the House know that the hon. minister yesterday, immediately after question period, was participating in a number of activities with dozens of Canadians wishing like her to fight racism in Canada. To suggest that she had “two hours” to do nothing and so on is inaccurate.
Third, it was said that the member had a long time to apologize. No, that is not stated correctly. The minister has apologized some time ago would be the more appropriate reference. In fact it was two hours and fifteen minutes.
Fourth, it was said in the House that the minister was not sincere when she apologized. That is impugning motives to someone else.