I am reluctant to get into a lengthy argument in this case at this time anyway.
In my opinion, what took place in the House was contrary to the standing orders.
In my opinion it is a situation where I believe the minister should be allowed to put his motion. I believe there has been a prima facie breach of the privileges of the House. The minister sought to raise the matter on Thursday morning and got my approval to delay it because of the events that had transpired on Wednesday night, so it was not raised at the earliest opportunity, but I indicated there would be no prejudice in respect of time because of the delay on Thursday morning.
Accordingly, in my view the motion is one that could now be brought before the House and I invite the minister to move his motion.