Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Lethbridge has identified the two main issues that are troubling the small percentage of people who will be directly affected by the bill. We think it would be good to go back and look at those two main areas in which we are more than likely to find contention.
When the bill came to us in the first place, it was not a perfect bill. It is a better bill now, there is no question about that. However, in doing this, we could take a look at those two areas of possible contention from coast to coast to coast. That is why I seconded the amendment of my colleague from Lethbridge. It is an amendment that is deserving of consideration.