Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this point of order?
The rule of relevancy is very generous and flexible. However, as we say at home, do not push your luck.
I have no objection to setting the tone, preparing arguments and other things, but we still have to come back to Bill C-46 that is currently under consideration. The member for Lotbinière—L'Érable is probably leading into his arguments, as is common practice among his colleagues from both sides of the House. I am certain that soon, he will start to talk about Bill C-46.