Mr. Speaker, obviously I could suggest to the member that she might want to get Hansard from November. There are enough pages there that she should be able to find our position fairly clearly.
Our position is clearly that transportation is one of the major producers of CO
2
, and that is a fact. I am saying that the bill does not deal with that. It does not deal with anything about Kyoto or CO
2
. What it should deal with is how we can encourage the transportation system to deal with the CO
2
Kyoto problem. We have committed to something and we should deal with conservation, if that is possible, in transportation, transitional fuels and alternate energy.
The government should have a long term vision for that. That is what it is all about and that is our position on it. I cannot make that clearer.