Mr. Speaker, will the Prime Minister acknowledge that he is not entitled to twist the meaning of his own motion?
It is not a motion to discover whether the House supports the mission. That is not the question.
The question asked is whether the House supports extending the mission by two years, without the House having any access to the information it needs?
Is the Prime Minister aware that the debate in the Netherlands took months and that the date of the vote was known well in advance.
Will the Prime Minister acknowledge that, if his repugnant motion is rejected by this House, we will have all the time needed to debate the matter and have the support of the House to extend the mission, once it has the information it needs?