Mr. Speaker, first I would like to congratulate my colleague for his excellent speech on Bill C-40.
At the very beginning of his address, he mentioned the tax relief for speech language pathology services in order to help our young people and seniors, for example.
He drew the quite obvious connection between increasing poverty in certain areas and the use of various services, especially social services, speech language pathology services, and certain other ones. He also said that Bill C-40 would correct certain deficiencies in these regards because the poorest people often cannot pay for these services. That is what I understood him to say, and I would appreciate it if he could explain a bit more for us. What would he think of exempting even more services or professions?