Mr. Speaker, I do not accept the assumptions upon which both the government and the member opposite have come to that conclusion. This document has been negotiated over 20 years. Legal experts from across Canada and around the world have negotiated, compromised and looked at its implications.
As I said in my earlier remarks, Canada's Constitution is a living document and accommodation is interpreted through the courts.
I suggest for the member opposite that the supposition upon which the government wants to build the rationale for its objection is a false one.