I do not think the minister is really raising a point of order. It sounds like a matter of debate. He may want to participate in the debate that is before the House now, because we are about to resume debate on a motion to concur in a committee report.
There is no point of order. There was a motion to adjourn the debate. The motion was defeated, so we resume the debate.
I cannot imagine how there could be a point of order. We had a vote and the vote result has been announced. We have not heard one so far, and I can see that other members are getting up to argue about something that in my view is not a point of order.
Is there a different point of order from the House Leader of the Official Opposition?