Yes, exactly, Mr. Speaker. The question is also why has the government not acted?
I would like to suggest five of them, just by way of example.
Do we need to decide whether the release of harmful substances from products during use or after disposal, including to house and into air, must be considered?
The potential harm from chronic exposure to the substance itself should be considered, in my view. The potential for harm to vulnerable populations, of course, is another. The cumulative exposure to a substance Canadians receive from the products of concern--