Mr. Chair, the member for Malpeque is a defender of farmers, and we appreciate that in the House.
Unfortunately, his party has not often stood up for Canadians. We saw that with the Liberal Party's support for the softwood lumber sellout, the shipbuilding sellout and the Colombia human rights sellout.
I think it is fair to say that the member for Malpeque and I would agree that the Conservative government has been egregiously bad for Canadian farmers, so bad that the farmers are now pressing to have agriculture research dollars restored to 1994 levels, and we have this sellout of supply management.
Given the huge significant increases in drug costs that are contained within the agreement, that have been put on the table by the Conservative government, and given the fact that supply management is on the table as well with huge implications for communities across this country, would the member for Malpeque stand and say that the Liberal Party will oppose this agreement with the provisions that are on the table now, given that this is clearly not in the public interest?