I appreciate the interventions by the members.
The convention around the notion of misleading the House has essentially been that if a member is saying that someone is deliberately or with intent misleading, then that begins to get very close to unparliamentary language. In this particular case, if it is constructed in a way that the effect of what the member has said seems to mislead, then that does not exactly point to being unparliamentary language.
We will decide that we have resolved that matter, and we will go back to the member for Skeena--Bulkley Valley.