Madam Speaker, the government does not want to answer very basic questions.
Some OECD countries are increasing the age to 67 years because they are spending much more on their elderly than Canada does. This is the conclusion of the OECD. The OECD predicts that by 2060 pension costs in Canada will amount to 6.2% of the GDP, in relative terms, less than what the OECD countries on average are spending today. This is why we do not need to raise the age to 67 years.
Could she answer why the OECD, the PBO and the Chief Actuary disagree with her? Could she answer that, for once?