Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his excellent speech.
My background is in technology, and as we always say, “If it ain't broke, don't fix it.”
In other words, if something works, there is no need to fiddle with it.
InSite works, gets results and provides a front-line service that leads to rehabilitation and the reduction of collateral damage, such as dirty needles in parks.
It is too bad that the government does not seem concerned about the effects of the law itself. I think we need to study this bill in terms of the public interest. What would be best for our society?
How does my colleague think we should study this bill in terms of the public interest?