Mr. Speaker, there is still a common thread in these different exercises: one set of rules for some people and a different set for others.
When a minister is given the right to tell the opposite of the truth in the House, it shows a lack of respect for our democratic parliamentary institutions.
How are the Conservative senators who are members of his caucus supposed to come to a decision other than the one that was already announced by the Prime Minister himself? The Prime Minister said in the House that he looked over the Wallin case and that there was no problem.
Does he really believe that the investigation will be objective?