Order. I would remind all members that an amendment to the motion before the House has already been moved. As such, the member for Burnaby—New Westminster is actually proposing a subamendment to that amendment.
I would like to point out to all members that O’Brien and Bosc states on page 534, under the section “Subamendments”:
Each subamendment must be strictly relevant to (and not at variance with the sense of) the corresponding amendment and must seek to modify the amendment, and not the original question; it cannot enlarge upon the amendment, introduce new matters foreign to it or differ in substance from the amendment.
On this basis, the proposed subamendment is not in order because it goes beyond the context of the amendment itself.
The hon. member for Burnaby—New Westminster is rising on a point of order.