Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Bourassa for his speech.
I have to say that I do not really understand why he thinks our motion was badly written because his entire argument sounds a whole lot like ours and his conclusion is the same.
However, I have one burning question. Maybe we do not know how to write, but does his leader have some trouble saying what he means? I ask because it seems like the Liberals are staunchly opposed to this, but their leader said that income splitting is a good idea.
I am having a hard time squaring those two positions, unless of course there are divisions in the Liberal ranks. If that is the case, can the member clarify?