Mr. Speaker, on the same point, if you would allow me, I would love to explain for the member, because it is a very important issue.
What we have before us today is a motion that would have a fairly significant impact on the way in which the House would operate going forward into the future.
It is completely relevant for us to be talking about the different types of issues coming before the House of Commons that will change the way the House actually conducts itself.
When the member makes reference to, for example, proactive disclosure and the impact it has on the behaviour inside this chamber, and when the member makes reference to the idea of unanimous consent, all of these types of things have a real tangible impact in terms of what is taking place inside the House.
It is a motion that should be thoroughly debated. We should not be trying to limit the scope of the debate, because by limiting the scope of the debate we are doing a disservice to the member who has introduced the motion.
In conclusion, what I would suggest to the member is that he might want to be a little more patient and little more open-minded as members try to express a different perspective, which I think is quite enlightening. Quite frankly, if the member would allow my colleague from Kingston and the Islands the opportunity to finish his comments, I am sure he would have a better understanding in terms of the relevancy—