Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague from Mégantic—L’Érable and his proverbial spirit.
We will be voting this evening, and I admit that I have not yet come to a decision because I am in agreement with motion in general. My question concerns one specific part of the motion.
My colleague undoubtedly remembers, as I do, that a documentary like L’Erreur boréale in Quebec, for example, largely contributed to changes in forestry practices in Quebec, which are now sounder and better than they were before.
The last part of the motion proposes having groups that have a say in the matter and industries face off in a conflict that is currently in court. I do not see how a fight like that would help the situation. In any case, it will be resolved in court, since the parties are already there.
I would like to hear what my colleague has to say about this.