Mr. Speaker, this is an important issue for all Canadians and for our security.
I know the minister, and I know him to be an honourable gentleman, so I want to give him a chance to correct something he has just said.
In his first answers, he was particularly prudent. In his first of five answers he talked about a screening. However, he knows, and we all know, that a screening is not a national security review. He then said, “procedures were followed”, which can mean anything and nothing. At the very end, the minister started saying that there was a national security review, which had a definition.
I would like him to clarify that. Was there or was there not a full national security—