Well, Mr. Speaker, the more we dig into the new environmental review process the uglier it gets.
The minister appears to have embedded in the bill provisions that will empower her to delay, suspend, and veto a project before it ever undergoes a full science-based review. That is not a streamlined process; that is a minister-knows-best process, which is based on politics and not science.
How can we trust a process based on the minister's whims? Will the minister now agree to remove her veto power from the bill?