Agreed.
No.
House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Registrar of the Supreme Court of CanadaSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Kings—Hants Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board
moved:
That Vote 1c, in the amount of $224,519,870, under Royal Canadian Mounted Police—Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (C) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 57. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Kings—Hants Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board
moved:
That Vote 5c, in the amount of $22,715,260, under Royal Canadian Mounted Polic —Capital expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (C) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 58. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 5c—Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceSupplementary Estimates (C), 2017-18Government Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.