All those opposed will please say nay.
House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety BoardGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety BoardGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety BoardGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $9,404,877, under Canadian Transportation Agency — Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 38. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian Transportation AgencyGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Liberal
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $2,416,995, under Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 39. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen: